Silicone breast implants have been a staple in the world of breast augmentation and reconstruction for decades. With continuous advancements in medical technology, new types of silicone implants are hitting the market. These innovative implants offer unique features, but like any medical device, they come with their own set of advantages and disadvantages. If you’re considering breast implant surgery, it’s crucial to understand these pros and cons to make an informed decision. In this article, we’ll explore four major new silicone breast implants and break down what they offer.
1. Cohesive Gel “Gummy Bear” Implants
What Are Cohesive Gel “Gummy Bear” Implants
Cohesive gel “gummy bear” implants have gained popularity in recent years. They are named so because the silicone gel inside is highly cohesive, much like the consistency of a gummy bear. This means the gel holds its shape even if the implant shell is cut or damaged. The gel is made through a special manufacturing process that cross – links the silicone polymers, resulting in a more stable and form – retaining structure.
Pros
Natural Look and Shape
One of the biggest advantages of gummy bear implants is their ability to provide a natural look. They are often anatomically shaped, mimicking the natural contour of the breast, especially in terms of upper – pole fullness. This gives a more lifted and natural appearance, whether you’re standing, sitting, or lying down. For example, compared to round implants, gummy bear implants can create a more teardrop – like shape, which is closer to the natural shape of a woman’s breast.
Reduced Risk of Rupture and Leakage
Due to their highly cohesive gel, these implants have a lower risk of rupture and leakage. If the implant shell is damaged, the gel is less likely to spill out. Instead, it will stay within the shell or, at most, form a small, contained mass if there’s a minor tear. This reduces the potential health risks associated with silicone leakage, such as the need for additional surgeries to remove leaked silicone.
Long – Lasting Results
Gummy bear implants tend to maintain their shape and integrity over a longer period. The stable gel structure is less likely to deform or deflate over time. This means that patients can enjoy the results of their breast augmentation or reconstruction for many years without significant changes in the appearance of their breasts.
Cons
Higher Cost
These implants are generally more expensive than traditional silicone implants. The complex manufacturing process required to create the highly cohesive gel contributes to the increased cost. This can be a significant deterrent for some patients who are on a budget and considering breast implant surgery.
Surgical Complexity
Implanting gummy bear implants requires more surgical skill and precision. The firmer gel is more difficult to insert through a small incision, and the surgeon needs to be careful to ensure proper placement. This may limit the number of surgeons who are experienced in using these implants, and patients may need to travel to find a qualified surgeon.
Limited Size Options
There may be a more limited range of sizes available for gummy bear implants compared to traditional implants. This can be a drawback for patients who have specific size requirements that are not covered by the available options.
2. Textured Silicone Implants
What Are Textured Silicone Implants
Textured silicone implants have a rough outer surface, as opposed to the smooth surface of traditional implants. The texture is created during the manufacturing process and is designed to interact with the surrounding tissue in a different way.
Pros
Reduced Risk of Capsular Contracture
Capsular contracture is a common complication with breast implants, where the body forms a capsule of scar tissue around the implant, and the capsule tightens, causing the breast to feel firm, distorted, or painful. Textured implants are thought to have a lower risk of capsular contracture. The rough surface encourages the body’s tissue to grow into the implant in a more natural way, reducing the likelihood of excessive scar tissue formation.
Enhanced Stability
The textured surface provides better stability for the implant within the breast pocket. It helps prevent the implant from shifting or rotating, which can be a concern with smooth – surfaced implants. This is especially important for anatomical implants, as maintaining the correct orientation is crucial for a natural appearance.
Cons
Risk of BIA – ALCL
There is a link between textured silicone implants and a rare form of cancer called breast – implant – associated anaplastic large – cell lymphoma (BIA – ALCL). Although the risk is relatively low, it is a serious concern. The exact cause of this association is still being studied, and it has led some patients and doctors to be more cautious about using textured implants.
Potential for Infection
The textured surface may provide more areas for bacteria to adhere to compared to a smooth surface. While the risk of infection is still relatively low, it is slightly higher than with smooth – surfaced implants. Infections can lead to a range of complications, including the need for implant removal.
3. High – Fill Silicone Implants
What Are High – Fill Silicone Implants
High – fill silicone implants are designed with a higher ratio of silicone gel to the implant shell volume. This results in a firmer implant with a more pronounced shape and projection.
Pros
Greater Projection and Fullness
These implants are ideal for patients who desire a more significant increase in breast size and projection. The high – fill gel allows for a more dramatic enhancement, providing a fuller and more voluptuous look. For example, women who have very small breasts or who have experienced significant breast volume loss can achieve a more substantial change with high – fill implants.
Shape Maintenance
The high – fill gel helps the implant maintain its shape better over time. It is less likely to sag or lose its form, even with factors like gravity and normal body movements. This can result in a more long – lasting and stable breast augmentation outcome.
Cons
Heavier Implants
Due to the higher volume of gel, high – fill implants are heavier than traditional implants. This can put more strain on the chest muscles and surrounding tissue, potentially leading to discomfort, especially in the long – term. Some patients may experience back or shoulder pain as a result of the added weight.
Higher Risk of Rippling in Thin – Skinned Patients
In patients with thin skin, high – fill implants may have a higher risk of rippling. The firmness and the amount of gel can cause visible ripples or wrinkles under the skin, which can be a cosmetic concern. This may require additional surgical techniques or the use of different implant placement methods to minimize the appearance of rippling.
4. Ultra – Soft Silicone Implants
What Are Ultra – Soft Silicone Implants
Ultra – soft silicone implants are engineered to have an extremely soft and natural feel. They use a special formulation of silicone gel that closely mimics the texture of natural breast tissue.
Pros
Exceptionally Natural Feel
As the name implies, these implants offer a remarkably natural feel. When touched or palpated, they are almost indistinguishable from real breast tissue. This can be a major advantage for patients who are very concerned about the implant feeling unnatural, whether it’s for their own comfort or for the perception of others.
Comfort
The softness of these implants can contribute to increased comfort. They feel less rigid and more comfortable to wear, especially during physical activities or when lying down. This can be particularly beneficial for patients who are active or who have a sensitivity to firm objects against their bodies.
Cons
Higher Risk of Rippling
One of the main drawbacks of ultra – soft implants is the higher risk of rippling. The soft gel is more likely to show ripples or wrinkles under the skin, especially in patients with less natural breast tissue or thinner skin. This can be a cosmetic issue and may require additional surgical procedures to correct.
Shape Maintenance
The ultra – soft gel may not maintain its shape as well as firmer gels. Over time, there is a slightly higher chance that the implant may change shape, especially if the patient experiences significant weight fluctuations or if the implant is not properly supported. This could potentially lead to an unnatural appearance.
Conclusion
Choosing the right silicone breast implant is a highly personal decision that should be based on a thorough understanding of the available options. Each of the four major new silicone breast implants we’ve explored – cohesive gel “gummy bear” implants, textured silicone implants, high – fill silicone implants, and ultra – soft silicone implants – has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. It’s essential to have an in – depth discussion with a qualified plastic surgeon who can assess your individual needs, body type, and aesthetic goals. They can help you weigh the pros and cons and make a decision that will lead to the best possible outcome for your breast implant surgery. Remember, the goal is not only to achieve the desired look but also to ensure your long – term health and satisfaction.
Related topics:
