Breast augmentation is a popular cosmetic procedure that many women choose to enhance the size and shape of their breasts. One of the first questions that often comes to mind when considering this surgery is, “Where do they cut for breast implants?” The choice of incision site is a crucial decision that can impact the outcome of the surgery, the visibility of scars, and the overall recovery process. In this article, we’ll explore the different incision options available for breast implant surgery, their advantages, disadvantages, and how your surgeon determines the best option for you.
1. Inframammary Incision
Location and Description
The inframammary incision is made in the crease under the breast, also known as the inframammary fold. This fold is a natural crease that runs horizontally across the bottom of the breast. The incision is typically placed within this fold, which helps to conceal the scar. The length of the incision can vary depending on the type and size of the implant being used. For most standard – sized implants, the incision is usually around 2 – 4 centimeters long.
Advantages
Good Access: Surgeons have excellent access to the breast tissue and the area where the implant will be placed. This allows for precise dissection and placement of the implant, whether it’s being placed above or below the chest muscle (pectoralis major).
Scar Concealment: Since the incision is located in the inframammary fold, it is often well – hidden. Even when wearing a swimsuit or revealing clothing, the scar is not easily visible as it lies within the natural crease of the breast.
Lower Risk of Capsular Contracture: Some studies suggest that the inframammary incision may have a slightly lower risk of capsular contracture, which is the formation of tight scar tissue around the implant. The reason for this is thought to be related to the reduced amount of tissue trauma in this area compared to other incision sites.
Disadvantages
Visible Scar in Some Cases: Although the scar is in the fold, in rare cases, it may become more visible over time. This can happen if the scar hypertrophies (becomes thick and raised) or if the breast tissue thins, causing the scar to be more prominent.
Limited Mobility During Recovery: Due to the location of the incision, there may be some discomfort and limited mobility in the early post – operative period. Activities that involve stretching the chest muscles, such as reaching overhead or lifting heavy objects, may be more restricted compared to other incision types.
Who is it Suitable for
The inframammary incision is a popular choice for many women. It is particularly suitable for those with enough natural breast tissue to cover the scar effectively. Women who are looking for a larger implant size may also benefit from this incision as it provides better access for implant placement. Additionally, it can be a good option for women who are planning to have a breast lift (mastopexy) in combination with breast augmentation, as the inframammary fold is often used as part of the lift procedure as well.
2. Periareolar Incision
Location and Description
The periareolar incision is made around the edge of the areola, which is the darker – colored area surrounding the nipple. The incision can be made either on the outer edge of the areola or on the border between the areola and the lighter – colored breast skin. The length of the incision depends on the implant size and the individual’s anatomy, but it is generally shorter than the inframammary incision, usually around 1.5 – 3 centimeters.
Advantages
Cosmetic Appeal: The periareolar incision can offer good cosmetic results as the scar blends in with the natural color and texture of the areola. Over time, the scar may become even less noticeable as the areola’s pigmentation helps to camouflage it.
Less Dissection: This incision requires less tissue dissection compared to some other methods. This can potentially lead to less post – operative pain and a quicker recovery in terms of tissue healing.
Nipple Sensation Preservation: In many cases, the periareolar incision allows for better preservation of nipple sensation. Since the incision is made close to the nipple, the nerves that supply sensation to the nipple are less likely to be damaged during the procedure.
Disadvantages
Limited Access: The access to the breast tissue for implant placement is more restricted compared to the inframammary incision. This can make it more challenging for the surgeon to place larger implants or to perform more complex procedures, such as placing the implant under the muscle.
Risk of Areola Distortion: There is a small risk of areola distortion with this incision. The scar tissue that forms during the healing process can cause the areola to change shape slightly. This is more likely to occur in women with very small areolas or in cases where the implant size is significantly larger than the natural breast tissue.
Higher Risk of Capsular Contracture: Some studies have indicated that the periareolar incision may have a slightly higher risk of capsular contracture compared to the inframammary incision. This could be due to the presence of glandular tissue in the area, which may be more prone to forming abnormal scar tissue around the implant.
Who is it Suitable for
The periareolar incision is a good option for women with larger areolas as the scar will be more easily concealed. It is also suitable for those who are looking for a smaller to medium – sized implant and who want to preserve nipple sensation. Women who are more concerned about the visibility of the scar on the breast itself may prefer this incision, as the scar is located in a more discreet area.
3. Transaxillary Incision
Location and Description
The transaxillary incision is made in the armpit (axilla). The incision is placed in the natural creases of the armpit, which helps to hide the scar. Through this incision, the surgeon creates a tunnel under the skin to reach the breast area where the implant will be placed. This method allows for the implant to be inserted without making an incision directly on the breast. The length of the transaxillary incision is typically around 2 – 5 centimeters, depending on the implant size and the individual’s anatomy.
Advantages
Scar Concealment: One of the main advantages of the transaxillary incision is that the scar is located in the armpit, which is a less visible area. Even when wearing sleeveless clothing, the scar is usually well – hidden within the folds of the armpit.
No Scar on the Breast: For women who are extremely concerned about having a scar on their breast, the transaxillary incision offers a solution as it leaves no visible scar on the breast itself.
Quick Recovery in Some Aspects: Since there is no direct incision on the breast, there may be less post – operative pain and swelling in the breast area compared to other incision types. This can potentially lead to a quicker return to normal activities in terms of breast – related discomfort.
Disadvantages
Limited Access and Implant Options: The transaxillary approach provides more limited access to the breast tissue compared to the inframammary incision. This can make it difficult to place certain types of implants, such as anatomical (teardrop – shaped) implants, as they require precise orientation. Additionally, it may be more challenging to place the implant under the muscle using this approach.
Risk of Nerve Damage: There is a risk of damaging the nerves in the armpit area during the creation of the tunnel to the breast. This can lead to numbness or altered sensation in the armpit, upper arm, or even the breast in some cases.
Higher Risk of Implant Malposition: Due to the indirect access to the breast, there is a slightly higher risk of the implant being placed in a less – than – optimal position. The surgeon may have more difficulty visualizing the exact placement of the implant compared to making an incision directly on the breast.
Who is it Suitable for
The transaxillary incision is suitable for women who are very concerned about having a visible scar on their breast. It can be a good option for those getting round implants, especially if they are of a relatively small to medium size. Women who are in good overall health and have a lower risk of nerve damage may also be candidates for this incision type.
4. Transumbilical Incision (TUBA)
Location and Description
The transumbilical incision, also known as TUBA, is a less common approach. As the name suggests, the incision is made in the navel (belly button). A special tool is used to create a tunnel from the navel up to the breast area. Through this tunnel, the implant is inserted into the breast pocket. This method is mainly used for saline – filled implants, as they can be inserted in a deflated state and then filled once in place. The incision in the navel is relatively small, usually around 1 – 2 centimeters.
Advantages
Highly Concealed Scar: The scar is located in the navel, which is a very discreet area. It is extremely difficult to see the scar, even when wearing a swimsuit or revealing clothing.
No Scar on the Breast: Similar to the transaxillary incision, TUBA leaves no scar on the breast, which can be appealing to women who want to avoid any visible marks on their chest.
Minimal Breast Tissue Disruption: Since the incision is made far from the breast, there is minimal disruption to the breast tissue itself. This can potentially lead to less post – operative pain and a lower risk of complications related to breast tissue trauma.
Disadvantages
Limited Implant Types: TUBA is mainly suitable for saline – filled implants. Silicone – filled implants, which are more commonly used in recent years due to their more natural feel, cannot be easily inserted through the small incision in the navel.
Steep Learning Curve for Surgeons: This technique requires specialized training and experience for the surgeon. The indirect access to the breast through the navel makes it a more challenging procedure, and not all surgeons are proficient in performing TUBA.
Higher Risk of Implant Malposition: Just like the transaxillary incision, the indirect access to the breast can make it more difficult for the surgeon to accurately position the implant. There is a higher risk of the implant being placed off – center or in an abnormal position.
Who is it Suitable for
TUBA is suitable for women who are specifically interested in saline – filled implants and who want to have a scar that is as concealed as possible. It may also be an option for women who have a lower risk of implant malposition and who are comfortable with the limited implant type available with this approach.
Conclusion
The choice of incision for breast implant surgery is a highly individualized decision that depends on several factors, including your personal preferences, the type and size of the implant you desire, and your surgeon’s recommendations. Each incision option has its own set of advantages and disadvantages, and your surgeon will carefully consider these factors to determine the best approach for you. It’s important to have an open and honest discussion with your surgeon about your goals, concerns, and expectations for the surgery so that you can make an informed decision about the incision site that is right for you. By understanding the different options available, you can take an active role in your breast augmentation journey and achieve the best possible results.
Related topics:
4 Ways About How To Increase Cup Size In 30 Days
Pros & Cons About Increasing Breast Size With Dumbbells
4 Possible Reasons For Female Bodybuilders To Get Breast Implants
