When it comes to breast augmentation or reconstruction, choosing the right implant material is a crucial decision. The implant material not only affects the appearance and feel of the breasts but also has implications for long – term health and satisfaction. In this article, we’ll explore the top 7 best implant materials in the world of cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery.
1. Silicone – Gel
Characteristics
Silicone – gel implants are one of the most popular choices for breast augmentation. The gel inside these implants is thick and cohesive, closely mimicking the texture and feel of natural breast tissue. The outer shell is made of silicone elastomer, which is durable and flexible. There are different types of silicone – gel, ranging from highly cohesive “gummy bear” implants to more traditional silicone – gel options.
Advantages
One of the main advantages of silicone – gel implants is their natural feel. They move and bounce in a way that is similar to natural breasts, providing a more realistic look and feel. They also tend to have a lower risk of rippling, which is when the implant’s surface becomes visible through the skin. Gummy bear implants, in particular, are known for their high – shape retention. They maintain their form well, even if the implant is cut in half, and are less likely to rupture or leak.
Disadvantages
The main concern with silicone – gel implants is the potential for rupture. Although the outer shell is durable, over time, due to factors like aging, trauma, or manufacturing defects, the implant can rupture. When a silicone – gel implant ruptures, the gel may leak into the surrounding tissue. There has been some debate about the potential health effects of leaked silicone, with some studies suggesting a possible link to autoimmune – like diseases, although the evidence is still inconclusive.
Who It’s Suitable For
Silicone – gel implants are suitable for women who want a very natural – looking and feeling breast augmentation. They are a great option for those who have a moderate to large amount of natural breast tissue, as the implants can blend in well and enhance the overall appearance. Women who are active and want their breasts to move naturally during physical activities also often prefer silicone – gel implants.
2. Saline
Characteristics
Saline – filled implants are filled with sterile saltwater. The outer shell is made of silicone elastomer, similar to silicone – gel implants. Saline implants are available in different sizes and profiles, allowing for customization based on the patient’s desired outcome.
Advantages
One of the major advantages of saline implants is their cost. They are generally less expensive than silicone – gel implants. Another advantage is that if the implant ruptures, the saline is absorbed by the body without causing significant harm. This makes them a relatively low – risk option in terms of potential health complications from implant failure.
Disadvantages
Saline implants have a higher tendency to ripple compared to silicone – gel implants. The saltwater inside the implant can move around, causing the implant’s surface to become visible through the skin, especially in women with less natural breast tissue or thinner skin. They also may not feel as natural as silicone – gel implants, as the texture of the saltwater is different from that of natural breast tissue.
Who It’s Suitable For
Saline implants are a good choice for women on a budget. They can also be suitable for those who are more concerned about the potential health risks associated with silicone – gel implants. Women with a larger amount of natural breast tissue may find that saline implants can provide the desired volume increase without the need for a more expensive silicone – gel option.
3. Polyurethane – Coated Implants
Characteristics
Polyurethane – coated implants have an outer layer made of polyurethane foam. This coating has unique properties that can interact with the body’s tissues. The foam is designed to reduce the formation of scar tissue around the implant.
Advantages
The main advantage of polyurethane – coated implants is their reduced risk of capsular contracture. Capsular contracture is a condition where the scar tissue that forms around the implant tightens and hardens, causing the breast to feel firm, painful, and potentially distort its shape. The polyurethane coating helps to prevent this by allowing the body’s tissues to grow into the foam, creating a more natural and flexible interface.
Disadvantages
Polyurethane – coated implants have been associated with a potential risk of developing a rare form of cancer called anaplastic large – cell lymphoma (ALCL). However, the risk is extremely low, and the benefits of the implant may outweigh this risk for some patients. Another drawback is that the polyurethane coating can degrade over time, which may require more frequent implant replacements.
Who It’s Suitable For
These implants are suitable for women who are at a higher risk of capsular contracture, such as those who have had previous breast surgeries or who have a history of excessive scarring. Women who are willing to accept the small risk of ALCL in exchange for a reduced risk of capsular contracture may also consider polyurethane – coated implants.
4. Hydrogel
Characteristics
Hydrogel implants are filled with a water – absorbing gel – like substance. The gel is designed to be soft and flexible, similar to natural breast tissue. The outer shell is typically made of a biocompatible material, often silicone – based, to contain the hydrogel.
Advantages
Hydrogel implants offer a soft and natural feel. The water – absorbing properties of the gel allow for a more comfortable and natural – looking augmentation. They also have a relatively low risk of causing an immune response in the body, as the hydrogel is designed to be biocompatible.
Disadvantages
One of the main concerns with hydrogel implants is the potential for the gel to leak. Although the outer shell is designed to be durable, there have been cases of gel leakage over time. Additionally, the long – term stability of hydrogel implants is still being studied, and there are concerns about the gel’s potential to break down or change its properties over the years.
Who It’s Suitable For
Hydrogel implants can be a good option for women who want a soft and natural – feeling breast augmentation. They may be suitable for those who are sensitive to other implant materials or who are looking for an alternative to traditional silicone – gel or saline implants.
5. Gummy Bear (Highly Cohesive Silicone – Gel)
Characteristics
Gummy bear implants, as mentioned earlier, are a type of highly cohesive silicone – gel implant. They are named so because of their firm, rubbery consistency, similar to gummy bears. The gel is formulated to be highly stable, with a strong internal structure that holds the implant’s shape well.
Advantages
The high – shape retention of gummy bear implants is a major advantage. They are less likely to rupture or leak compared to traditional silicone – gel implants. They also provide a very natural – looking result, as they maintain their shape and position well within the breast. Gummy bear implants are available in different shapes and profiles, allowing for a high degree of customization.
Disadvantages
The main disadvantage of gummy bear implants is their cost. They are generally more expensive than traditional silicone – gel implants due to their advanced manufacturing process and the higher quality of the silicone – gel used. Additionally, the surgical placement of gummy bear implants can be more technically challenging for the surgeon, as the firmness of the implant requires precise handling.
Who It’s Suitable For
Gummy bear implants are suitable for women who want a long – lasting, natural – looking breast augmentation with a reduced risk of rupture. They are a great choice for those who are willing to invest more in their breast augmentation and who want the best possible outcome in terms of shape and durability.
6. Allergan Natrelle 410 Implants
Characteristics
Allergan Natrelle 410 implants are a type of form – stable silicone – gel implant. They are designed with a unique shape and a highly cohesive gel. The implant’s shape is anatomically inspired, meaning it is designed to mimic the natural shape of a breast.
Advantages
These implants offer a very natural – looking shape. The form – stable nature of the implant ensures that it maintains its shape over time, reducing the risk of deformation. The highly cohesive gel also provides a natural feel. The anatomical shape of the implant can enhance breast symmetry, especially in cases of breast reconstruction or for women with asymmetrical breasts.
Disadvantages
The cost of Allergan Natrelle 410 implants is relatively high. Similar to gummy bear implants, their surgical placement can be more challenging due to their shape and firmness. There have also been some reports of implant – associated ALCL with these implants, although the risk is still considered low.
Who It’s Suitable For
Allergan Natrelle 410 implants are suitable for women who want a highly customized, natural – looking breast augmentation or reconstruction. They are especially beneficial for those with breast asymmetry or for those who require a more anatomically – correct breast shape.
7. Mentor MemoryShape Implants
Characteristics
Mentor MemoryShape implants are another type of form – stable silicone – gel implant. They are designed to have a high degree of shape retention. The gel inside the implant is formulated to return to its original shape even after being compressed or deformed.
Advantages
The shape – retention properties of Mentor MemoryShape implants are a significant advantage. They can provide a long – lasting, consistent breast shape. The natural feel of the silicone – gel also makes them a popular choice. These implants are available in a variety of sizes and profiles, allowing for customization based on the patient’s needs.
Disadvantages
As with other form – stable implants, the cost of Mentor MemoryShape implants is relatively high. The surgical placement may require more skill from the surgeon due to the firmness of the implant. There is also a potential risk of implant – related complications, such as capsular contracture, although the risk is similar to that of other silicone – gel implants.
Who It’s Suitable For
Mentor Memory Shape implants are suitable for women who want a long – term, reliable breast augmentation. They are a good option for those who are willing to invest in a high – quality implant and who value the stability of the implant’s shape over time.
Conclusion
Each of these implant materials has its own unique characteristics, advantages, and disadvantages. The choice of implant material depends on a variety of factors, including the patient’s desired outcome, budget, health history, and personal preferences. It’s important to have a thorough consultation with a board – certified plastic surgeon to make an informed decision about which implant material is right for you. The surgeon can provide personalized advice based on your individual circumstances and help you understand the potential risks and benefits of each option.
Related topics：
Implant Removal Side Effects: Do You Know?
